central broadcasting network Beijing on August 29th news (reporter Sun Ying) the Supreme People's court today (29 days) at a court requisition ten big typical case. House expropriation, demolition compensation and expropriation is closely related to the immediate interests, especially the current local in speeding up the process of city construction, collective land expropriation and housing removal compensation more prominent contradictions, but contradictions more acute, more should obey the law. The supreme law published cases of such disputes, the hearing is of certain guidance.
The ten typical cases of the supreme law of the release of, which involves many aspects of expropriation and demolition. Yang Ruifen v. Zhuzhou City Hall housing levy decision in the case of the houses to be expropriated, mostly in the construction planning red line Cheap Burberry Sunglasses within only a small part of the housing, not included in the construction planning red line. If only the demolition of planning red line within the housing, the housing will be preserved buildings lose their function and value. In the legal application difficulty in such cases, the people's Cheap EDhardy Sunglasses Government of rule of law requires the implementation of the housing levy work must be subject to construction planning red line constraint, shall not be any breakthrough. But the administrative organ if the defending line, do not go beyond the prescribed limit half step, not to levy the red line outside the small part of the housing and by the continued to live, is clearly not conducive to the demolition of the safety of life and property, but also affect the project construction.
court thought is the legal principle of combining the rules and regulations in the city, "state-owned land on the housing levy and management regulations," article "to safeguard public interests, legislative purpose be imposed to protect the legitimate rights and interests of housing ownership" as the basis. According to the court's ruling, the whole collection of Yang Ruifen's house, and give reasonable compensation. Complement the insufficient planning red line, not only in line with the objective reality, but also reflects the people-oriented, protection needs to be levied human life and property safety.
Thecase shows, Ai Zhengyun, Sha Defang to make compensation decisions not to the plaintiff to housing assessment results, deprived of their rights in accordance with the law, the prosecution of the Ma'anshan municipal government request for revocation of the rain in the mountains, compensation for housing levy decision made by the government according to law "". Court that, according to the provisions of "state-owned land on the housing levy and Compensation Ordinance", the value of the houses to be expropriated, the real estate price assessment agencies in accordance with the housing tax assessment to determine to evaluation. Cheap Cartier Original Sunglasses Have objections to the assessment results, can apply for a review, still have objections, can evaluate the Expert Committee for appraisal to the real estate Cheap Cartier Sunglasses price. According to the "state-owned land on the housing levy assessment approach" provisions, house cheap oakley sunglasses free shipping expropriation departments should be housing household preliminary evaluation results in the owners within the scope of expropriation publicity. Expiration of the public, should be referred to the household assessment report to be imposed. Evidence of house expropriation departments, not the contents of the report promptly to the plaintiff, resulting in their application for review and an identification of the loss of rights, which belongs to the violation of legal procedure. The court revoked the compensation housing levy decision made by the government of "".
believes that the Supreme Court, the housing value evaluation report written content is the important foundation for compensation housing levy decision, will determine how > expropriation compensation benefits
没有评论:
发表评论